WEKO3
アイテム
ディスコース概念の再考--Van Dijk及びFaircloughの言説概念の検討
https://doi.org/10.24516/00000278
https://doi.org/10.24516/00000278bed7f211-be65-4620-9123-0704d0b8b5e0
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2020-07-22 | |||||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||||
タイトル | ディスコース概念の再考--Van Dijk及びFaircloughの言説概念の検討 | |||||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||||
タイトル | A review of the concept of discourse: focusing on the difference between the perspectives of Van Dijk and Fairclough | |||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||||
言語 | ||||||||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
主題 | 言説 | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
主題 | 談話 | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
主題 | 批判的ディスコ-ス分析(CDA) | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
主題 | Van Dijk | |||||||||||
キーワード | ||||||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
主題 | N. Fairclough | |||||||||||
資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||||
ID登録 | ||||||||||||
ID登録 | 10.24516/00000278 | |||||||||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||||
著者 |
中西, 満貴典
× 中西, 満貴典
× Nakanishi, Mikinori
|
|||||||||||
抄録 | ||||||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
内容記述 | The aim of this study is to reconsider the concept of `discourse', spotlighting the viewpoints of the paradigm of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). `Discourse' has been diversely defined by leading theorists depending on their disciplines, such as linguistics, sociolinguistics, and sociology including ethnomethodology or Foucault's theory of knowledge / power. First, we review lexical meaning of `discourse' as it is defined in various dictionaries. Then, we outline various sociolinguistic definitions of the term in reference to Discourse Analysis. The main discussion consists of two parts which deal with the frame of reference in CDA. The first examines Van Dijk's concept of `discourse' and the second reviews Fairclough's argument that `discourse' is language use conceived as social practice. | |||||||||||
内容記述 | ||||||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
内容記述 | The aim of this study is to reconsider the concept of `discourse', spotlighting the viewpoints of the paradigm of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). `Discourse' has been diversely defined by leading theorists depending on their disciplines, such as linguistics, sociolinguistics, and sociology including ethnomethodology or Foucault's theory of knowledge / power. First, we review lexical meaning of `discourse' as it is defined in various dictionaries. Then, we outline various sociolinguistic definitions of the term in reference to Discourse Analysis. The main discussion consists of two parts which deal with the frame of reference in CDA. The first examines Van Dijk's concept of `discourse' and the second reviews Fairclough's argument that `discourse' is language use conceived as social practice. | |||||||||||
書誌情報 |
岐阜市立女子短期大学研究紀要 en : Bulletin of Gifu City Women's College 巻 57, p. 29-39, 発行日 2007 |
|||||||||||
出版者 | ||||||||||||
出版者 | 岐阜市立女子短期大学 | |||||||||||
ISSN | ||||||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||||
収録物識別子 | 09163174 | |||||||||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
収録物識別子 | AN10208264 | |||||||||||
論文ID(NAID) | ||||||||||||
識別子タイプ | NAID | |||||||||||
関連識別子 | 110006840570 |