WEKO3
アイテム
An Agenda for Communication Studies : A Dialogical Reading of The Twilight of Common Dreams
https://doi.org/10.24516/00000169
https://doi.org/10.24516/00000169a3e95505-1c5d-4156-bbea-b730650bd7c1
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
Agenda_Nakanishi (181.0 kB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2020-06-30 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | An Agenda for Communication Studies : A Dialogical Reading of The Twilight of Common Dreams | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | An Agenda for Communication Studies : A Dialogical Reading of The Twilight of Common Dreams | |||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | communication studies | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | multiculturalism | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | Enlightenment | |||||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||||
| 主題 | dialogism | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.24516/00000169 | |||||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||||
| 著者 |
中西, 満貴典
× 中西, 満貴典
× Nakanishi, Mikinori
|
|||||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | The main purpose of this paper is to raise a point for discussion of communication studies by critically reading Todd Gitlin's argument, that is, the claim that we should build a common ground so that we can solve the dangerous situation called "cultural wars." We assume that the common ground Gitlin proposes is not only a space where we can pursue the ideal of a calm discussion between conflicting parties, but also a place in which we can nullify the claims of both sides enslaved by a dichotomic way of thinking. The first process of discussion is that we attempt to reveal the relationships between the Enlightenment and a monologic principle, referring to Horkheimer & Adorno and Mikhail Bakhtin. The second step is whether we can explore the possibilities of seeing a monologic concept as a matter of communication, posing an agenda for communication studies. | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | The main purpose of this paper is to raise a point for discussion of communication studies by critically reading Todd Gitlin's argument, that is, the claim that we should build a common ground so that we can solve the dangerous situation called "cultural wars." We assume that the common ground Gitlin proposes is not only a space where we can pursue the ideal of a calm discussion between conflicting parties, but also a place in which we can nullify the claims of both sides enslaved by a dichotomic way of thinking. The first process of discussion is that we attempt to reveal the relationships between the Enlightenment and a monologic principle, referring to Horkheimer & Adorno and Mikhail Bakhtin. The second step is whether we can explore the possibilities of seeing a monologic concept as a matter of communication, posing an agenda for communication studies. | |||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
岐阜市立女子短期大学研究紀要 en : Bulletin of Gifu City Women's College 巻 61, p. 17-22, 発行日 2011 |
|||||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||||
| 出版者 | 岐阜市立女子短期大学 | |||||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0916-3174 | |||||||||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN10208264 | |||||||||||
| 論文ID（NAID） | ||||||||||||
| 識別子タイプ | NAID | |||||||||||
| 関連識別子 | 110009432633 | |||||||||||
